To see some of the more significant matters (reported and unreported) that Joel has appeared and advised in, please go to 'Extended Biography'.
Overview of Practice
Joel has developed a broad commercial practice since arriving at the Bar, with a particular expertise in building, construction, and property matters (including development disputes). In addition to appearing at trials, mediations, and on applications, he is regularly engaged to give pre-litigation advice, including on contractual disputes and consumer law issues.
He has also appeared and advised in matters concerning corporations, torts (trespass, nuisance, defamation, negligence, misleading conduct), employment/industrial relations, banking and finance, retail tenancies, and motor vehicles collisions.
Joel accepts briefs in all Courts and Tribunals (state and federal), and has obtained significant experience in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). He read with Jeremy Twigg QC.
To view Joel's full CV, and to find some of his published works, you can visit his LinkedIn profile.
Relevant Skills and Experience
Joel continues to accumulate skills and experience which enhance his practice. These include:
Banking and Finance
ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Loftus  VSC 342 (Supreme Court of Victoria, led by Paul J Hayes [now S.C.]), appeal from decision of an Associate Justice.
Sgargetta v National Australia Bank  VSCA 159 (Victorian Court of Appeal, led by Paul J Hayes [now S.C.]), appeal from County Court of Victoria concerning construction of a Deed of Settlement.
Building and Construction
Raniti CBMS v Ryan  No. BP60/2017 (VCAT), trial concerning a domestic building contract with an insurer-determined scope of works - issues concerning surface and subsurface drainage - need for building permit (ongoing)
Bitu-Mill v Australian Commercial Builders  D13835669 (Magistrates' Court of Victoria), defence and counterclaim concerning defective asphalt pavement, involving matters of design responsibility, express and implied warranties, exclusion clauses.
Haris v Kemal  No. C1816/2014 and No. C4846/2014 (VCAT), action concerning the construction of an additional dwelling on land by an owner builder for a family friend (settled by parties at trial).
Harmonious Blend Building Corporation (t/a Clark New Homes) v Ibraham (Building and Property)  VCAT 1084 (led by Jeremy A F Twigg [now QC]), defence and counterclaim to action by Builder under the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995.
Radovanovic & Djekic v Rizkez Constructions  No. D1344/2013 (VCAT), defence to claim against Builder concerning works undertaken and the scope of a domestic building contract (setting aside default order, appearence at compulsory conference, with settlement reached shortly after).
Commercial & Contracts
Asian Restaurants Concepts Franchising & Ors ('Noodle Box') v Mt Gravatt Noodle Box & Ors  SC ECI 2017 00160 (Supreme Court of Victoria), acting for parties associated with former franchisee on application by franchisor for interlocutory injunction to force urgent closure post-termination of franchise agreement - issues concerning Franchising Code of Conduct, restraint of trade clauses - whether franchisee required to cease trade and terminate lease - whether franchisee entitled to renew agreement - injunction refused.
Sharma v Sharma  F13320117 (Magistrates' Court of Victoria), claim between Indian nationals, uncle paid for niece to live and study in Australia (2001-7) - in 2015, alleges oral loan agreement in 2000, no contemporaneous notes - uncle to make subjective determination that niece capable of repayment - repayment term void for uncertainty, recovery barred after 6 years (Limitation of Actions Act 1958, s 5) - words giving rise to agreement not proven to standard in Watson v Foxman.
Raamish & Ayra v City of Melbourne  VSC 277 (Supreme Court of Victoria), action in equity and misleading conduct for injunction and damages concerning alleged arrangement to berth ferry.
Lowther v Wood (t/a Hudson Advisory Group) (Civil Claims)  VCAT 1499, action against mortgage broker and financial adviser under Australian Consumer Law for alleged misleading advice.
Goldsmith v Brous  SCI14-05226 (Supreme Court of Victoria, led by Paul J Hayes [now S.C.]), defence to defamation action (settled at mediation).
E v Physiotherapy Board of Australia (Review and Regulation)
Martin v Dyson (deceased)  SCI 2015-05051 (Supreme Court of Victoria), claim for equitable interest by proprietary estoppel over land occupied by client's parents, then client, upon promise by uncle (owner of land) of a life interest - family home sold to fund establishment of new dwelling on occupied land - whether promise extended to client - whether expectations of client/parents from promise were reasonable, or benefits amoratised over 20 years' occupation (matter settled at trial).
Frigo v Perry (Owners Corporations)  VCAT 730, action in nuisance, interference with easements implied by section 12(2) of the Subdivision Act 1988 over driveway to rear lot on on a "battleaxe block" - front owner prevented from accessing side of own home via driveway by locked gate - neighbour required to permit access.
Murthy v KPS Services Pty Ltd  SCI 2015 00728 (Supreme Court of Victoria), application under Transfer of Land Act section 90(3) to remove caveat lodged without a legitimate basis, indemnity costs sought – defendant withdrew caveat before hearing, offered to pay party/party costs - application pursued despite withdrawal - indemnity costs obtained.
O'Sullivan v The Hon. Daniel Andrews, Premier of Victoria  VSC 560 (Supreme Court of Victoria, led by Daryl J Williams QC) application for mandamus following nomination to fill vacancy in Legislative Council, but no joint sitting called as specified in section 27A of the Victorian Constitution.
Shurat HaDin – Israel Law Centre v Lynch  NSD2235/2013 (Federal Court of Australia, led by Marcus Solomon SC), action concerning unlawful discrimination under the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (settled prior to trial).
Lazarous t/a Loscar Barbers v Kypri & Kypri  No. BP1046/2017 (VCAT), urgent interlocutory application brought following lockout of the tenant by the landlord - failure by landlord to particularise breaches in ostensible notices of breach, re-entry before time set under Property Law Act 1958 sub-s 146(2) – shown serious question to be tried, harm to tenant not adequately remedied by damages - interlocutoryinjunction granted (ongoing)
Glowell International v Biggin & Scott Commercial and 418 St Kilda Road (Building and Property)  VCAT 1342, issues concerning applicability of the Retail Leases Act 2003, construction of the terms of the lease, letter of offer versus signed lease - whether accounting fees incurred solely for litigation are damages or costs.
Grenville Trading v Braszell (Building and Property)  VCAT 877 (led by Thomas G Moloney), question of issue estoppel – failure of supermarket floor, second preliminary question - landlord sought declaration that lease not renewed due to finding on first preliminary question - tenant says breaches by landlord were not the subject of the previous hearing - whether Tribunal finally determined that tenant not entitled to withold rent for alleged breach by landlord - whether tenant entitled to renew lease - held issue not finally determined.