Anthony Krohn has practised in administrative law since 1990, as a solicitor from 1990 to 1997, and as a barrister from 1997 to the present.

He has appeared in many refugee and migration cases in the Federal Circuit Court, the Federal Court and the High Court of Australia, and the Supreme Court of Nauru.

From 2010 unti 2015, Anthony Krohn was also a member of the Migration Review Tribunal and the Refugee Review Tribunal. Some of his decisions are reported.

As well as practising in refugee and migration law, Anthony Krohn practises in the law of Citizenship, Extradition, Guardianship and Administration, Intervention Orders, and Mental Health.

Anthony Krohn is generally interested in constitutional law and human rights. He also is interested in ecclesiastical law, and is familiar with the canon law of the Catholic Church. He also has a keen interest in the law of arms (heraldry).

Reported cases in which Anthony Krohn has appeared include:

In the High Court of Australia:

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Ex Parte Meng Kok Te Applicant/Prosecutor; Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Ex Parte Dung Chi Dang Applicant/Prosecutor [2002] HCA 48; 212 CLR 162; 193 ALR 37; 77 ALJR 1 (7 November 2002, with C Maxwell QC (now President of the Court of Appeal) contra D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth with C Gunst QC, W S Mosley and P R D Gray (Constitutional Law - Naturalisation and aliens - Immigration - Whether ss 200 and 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) are supported by s 51 (xix) or (xxvii) of the Constitution - Meaning of "alien" and "citizen". Relevance of absorption into the community and allegiance to the Queen of Australia.

In the Federal Court of Australia

Yilmaz v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 906 (14 July 2000, Spender, Marshall and Gyles JJ)

• Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274, (2001) 106 FCR 426  (21 March 2001, Heerey, Goldberg and Weinberg JJ) (Whether failure to give "proper, genuine and realistic consideration” to claim constituted ground for review under Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (C’th)
• VHAJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 186 (15 August 2003, Moore, Kenny & Downes JJ) (construction of section 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (C’th) concerning obligation of Tribunal to give particulars of adverse information to applicant)
• VTAO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 927 (19 July 2004, Merkel J) (Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal constructively failed to exercise its jurisdiction)
• VAF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 123 (12 May 2004, Finn, Merkel and Stone JJ, appeared with C Gunst QC) (Further construction of section 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (C’th)
• Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318 (27 August 2007, Kenny J.) (Whether the Tribunal acted unreasonably in failing to make enquiries of interviewing officer/delegate – exceptional case – finding of jurisdictional error upheld)